Underlying Reason For Crime

Theoretical Explanations of Murder by laborer Henry Abbott (Your NameIntroduction to felonious Justice CJ246-11January 9 , 2007This asserts that both nature and nurture ar to turn on for jak Abbott s twist life , and that derived function tie beam guess aptly explains the friendly forces and conditions that bred the criminalAt its shopping center , symbolic action surmise focuses on how stack furbish up reality , how they persona out the world around them , and how they delineate and fuck the actions of sight around them . The focus in this theory is the meanings attributed to actions and symbols and how meaning is learned and modified internally by people . The theory seeks to interpret the factors influencing the interpretation of actions , as well as patterns of viewing that bequeath in similar interpretat ions for some opposite kind circumstances . It assumes that affectionate reality is a knowledgeability by people , arising as standards and patterns of behaviour when people interact ( Traditional Sociological ParadigmsIn explaining the aberrant behavior and life of Jack Henry Abbott using sociological theory , a bewitching line needs to be drawn between how a good deal of Abbott s behavior is due to his early(a) history of juvenile delinquency and his extensive years in prison , and how much of it can be attributed to Abbott s ingrained aberrant tendencies . In other words , I would like to fence that both nature , the inherent criminal tendencies of Abbott , and nurture , his accessible conditioning from his reform school stretch to his long immurement in jail which further primed(p) him , are to blame . In the case of Abbott , I pretend the appropriate rack to take is that inherent unnatural tendencies gave inception to deviant actions necessitating penitent iary action from union , with the subsequen! t experience of brutality and closing off in jail reinforcing diseased deviant tendencies and behaviors .

We reject explanations from a strictly labeling theory stand , or that the behavior and actions of Abbott when he was still alive is deviant because society has deemed it so because it seems to me to annul some objective rules of behavior , such as for ideal , the prohibition against killing and take . Labeling theory is also inappropriate because it negates to a significant extent Abbott s ingrained criminal inclinations as well , and his seeming pretermit of sensitivity and regard for society and its basi c rules . We reject theories on experienced power and inconsistency for the corresponding(p) reasons - other people subjected to the same inequalities do non become criminally deviantWith that clarification , I think differential association theory ( Sutherland s differential association ) applies to Jack Abbott . This theory holds that people who behave deviantly tend to form social bonds with other deviants , from whom they learn deviant norms and values According to this prospect , the same processes of socialization produce deviant behavior as conform behavior is (Sutherland s Differential Association . Every social separate transmits its own cultural norms and values to new members by dint of family influences and couple pressure . The new members adopt these norms and values as their own because they are immersed in...If you want to get a estimable essay, fix it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay