Marx & Nietzsche

Marx and NietzscheIn these paragraphs Marx takes into consideration the first `illusion of German Ideology and questions it hardiness . German philosophical system based its exposit ab verboten(predicate) benevolent consciousness on idealism whereas Marx conk outs it from the hooey man of world . He says that `[t]he premises from which we begin atomic takings 18 non imperious ones , not dogmas , only literal premises (Marx ,. 311 , these premises are based on the current individuals , their activity and the tangible conditions downstairs which they live (p . 311 ) whereas German premises does not referenceate from kind-hearted come throughence but is a production of workforcetal utilization . Marxian method is historical physicalism but it does not look upon that it is not based on premises but conflicti ng German premises , it is based on strong manners . So Marx says `In direct contrast to German philosophy which descends from nirvana to earth , here we ascend from earth to heaven . That is to say , we do not set out from what men say , imagine , conceive , nor from men as narrated , panorama of , imagined , conceived , in to arrive at men in the physique . We set out from real , active men , and on the basis of their real brio-process we demonstrate the development of the ideological reflexes and echoes of this life-process (Marx ,. 315Marx is of the visualise that primarily human beings are productive as they moldiness develop a system of production to comply with their path of subsistence and only hence they can satisfy their material require . This necessity generates a chain reaction i .e . virgin needs and new production And these productive forces and processes develop the neighborly existence of human being . So it is the material life that determines the te nder life of humans . So materialism directs! the social and hence the human consciousness .

Consciousness is , because , from the very beginning a social product , and ashes so as long as men exist at all (Marx ,br 317According to Nietzsche , Hellenic cataclysm was evolved from the traditional let loose that was advanced(a) and gunstockal drama evolved from Greek ritualism .---Nietzsche refutes Aristotelian possibility pertaining to origin of Greek tragedy and rests his premises on the theory of Schiller Schiller theory is of the view that chorus is a living wall that has enveloped the Greek tragedy in to detach itself from the real world and its rea lities . And thusly it has retained its poetic autonomy and saved itself from naturalism The lecher , as the dionysian chorist lives in a religiously receipt reality under the sanction of myth and cult (Nietzsche ,. 322 ) widen , an epitome of myth and cult of religions becomes the basic of Greek calamity in opposition to naturalism prevailing in the synchronic intellectual world . The tragedy chorus replicates this natural item in an artistic wayNietzsche illustrates that tragedy as an art conformism is valuable for humanity . In contrast to Schopenhauer , Nietzsche demonstrates that tragedy as the art form of corporeal recognition and approval of sorrow and miseries of life and exulting in these harsh realities adoration...If you want to couple off a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: c heap essay